🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “total contradiction” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Documents seen by journalists originating from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the nation's political leaders demands measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be abandoned or delayed.

The tobacco firm seeks changes to a draft bill that include reductions in the proposed size of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and watered-down penalties for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“Were I in government, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented the health advocate.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was believed to have been distributed to several government departments and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during broader worries about corporate intervention with health policies. In recent weeks, WHO officials raised concerns that the cigarette manufacturers was intensifying efforts to weaken global control measures.

“We see evidence of industry lobbying everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” said the corporate monitoring director.

Possible outcomes

“Should anti-smoking legislation fails to be approved because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and requiring that graphic health warnings cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

In the letter, the corporation proposes this be decreased to 30% or 50% “according to global recommended threshold”, deferred for no less than one year after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities specifically advises a caution must occupy at least half of the front of a pack “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavoured tobacco products, claiming that it would lead smokers to “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The proposed legislation suggests penalties for multiple violations “ranging from a portion of yearly revenue to ten-year jail sentences”.

Corporate defense

Through correspondence, the corporate leader of the African subsidiary states the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to lower tobacco use and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

The advocate stated the corporation's recommended amendments would “undermine this law so much that the necessary effect for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “complete contradiction”, he commented.

“We exist in a international community. If I plant tobacco in my property and harvest that and market the products – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to enrich myself and all the future family lines while my community's youth are dying … is in itself absolute spiritual failure.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, the campaigner stated. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator commented: “BAT Zambia conducts its operations according with relevant national regulations. Additionally, the firm contributes in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for relevant group engagement in policymaking.”

The corporation remained “not resisting legislation”, they said, mentioning that minors should be protected from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We champion developing rules to accomplish desired population health targets, while recognizing the range of rights and obligations on businesses, users and involved parties,” they said, adding that BAT’s proposals “represent the situation of the local commercial environment and smoking product business, which involves rising levels of black market activity”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.